Into the Book


As disappointing as the first MacDonald book I opened was (link to review), I wasn’t expecting much of the second. Thankfully, The Princess and the Goblin at least neutralized my bad opinion of MacDonald, though I wouldn’t venture so far as to call the book a favorite. In short, it was an interesting book which kept my attention, which makes it good but not necessarily great.

The book at least follows a cohesive plot and story, which already place it above Phantastes. It tells the story of a princess, Irene, and her friend Curdie. Irene has been selected by the goblins to be kidnapped in their plan to take over the Abovegrounds. Curdie, a miner, is the only one who hears of their plans and the only one who can stop them. Along the way, Irene is aided by her grandmother (An interesting character who, in true MacDonald fashion, is left infuriatingly unexplained).

I will say one thing: MacDonald’s actual writing does not lack. Thankfully, when coupled with a fairly good plot as this one, the book is actually somewhat enjoyable. The real litmus test exists when there is a sequel (The Princess and Curdie). Since I look forward to reading the sequel, I have concluded that this book was a good book, overall. It kept my attention and though it dragged a little, let’s remember it was written in the 1800s.

Overall, I’ll adjust my former rating of MacDonald to the fact that he’s a pretty good writer, but in my opinion there’s other writers that do the same thing so much better. Still, to be fair, MacDonald was one of the pioneers of the fantasy genre. So, if you’re interested, I’d definitely recommend you give this one a try over Phantastes.

This is an email update from Into the Book. Contact us Here. Or, like our Facebook Page.

Published on 12 September, 2011. Last updated on


  1. Corey P.

    I really enjoyed this one when I read it a few years back. Good review, though I’m curious… what does the fact that the story drags a little here and there have to do with its being written in the 1800s? 🙂

  2. Man O' Clay

    Corey P.,

    In my opinion it means we’re much too used to stories these days that move from one event to the next. As I said in my comments on the review of Phantastes, there’s little room these days for the poetic, which leads us to want action, action, action.

    If you’ve enjoyed Tolkien, Lewis, or L’Engle you must give MacDonald much more credit. The writers above were highly inspired by MacDonald – there’s more than meets the eye with him, and yes, there are things that are left unexplained, but that only adds to the mystery and the beauty.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.